d9ad982373
The 3.97.0-beta.0 release PR (#899) failed its backend Tests job on slideshowPublic.test.js: bootCrmDb's full migration chain crossed the suite's explicit 30s beforeAll timeout argument on a slow runner. #860 raised the config default and the jest.setTimeout pins to 120s, but hook-ARGUMENT pins override the config default and were left behind — same time-bomb, different syntax. Every beforeAll that boots the migration chain and pinned 30s/60s is raised to 120000 (16 suites). Untouched on purpose: the three suites whose pinned hooks don't run migrations (webhookDelivery, imageProcessor.storage, storageBackend) and publicQuotes' 30s pin on the rate-limit lockout test — neither grows with the migration chain. No test logic changed. Co-authored-by: Paul Nothaft <paul@MacStudio-von-Paul.local>
178 lines
5.8 KiB
JavaScript
178 lines
5.8 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* Unit tests for rating removal (#884).
|
|
*
|
|
* Pins the contract of `feedbackService.submitFeedback` for
|
|
* `feedback_type: 'rating'` with `rating: 0` ("clear my rating"):
|
|
* - An existing rating row is DELETED (not updated to 0 — a stored 0
|
|
* would drag the photo's average down and still count in totals).
|
|
* - Photo stats (average_rating) are recalculated after the delete.
|
|
* - Rating 0 with no existing rating is a no-op that never inserts a row.
|
|
* - Removal is guest-scoped: clearing guest A's rating leaves guest B's
|
|
* rating (and the resulting average) intact.
|
|
* - Regular re-rating (3 → 5) still updates in place.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const os = require('os');
|
|
|
|
process.env.NODE_ENV = 'test';
|
|
process.env.TEST_DATABASE_PATH = path.join(
|
|
fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'picpeak-rating-removal-')), 'db.sqlite',
|
|
);
|
|
process.env.JWT_SECRET = process.env.JWT_SECRET || 'rating-removal-test-secret';
|
|
|
|
const { bootCrmDb, seedMinimal } = require('../integration/helpers/crmDb');
|
|
|
|
const feedbackService = require('../../src/services/feedbackService');
|
|
|
|
const EVENT_SLUG = 'rating-removal-event';
|
|
const GUEST_A = 'guest-a-identifier';
|
|
const GUEST_B = 'guest-b-identifier';
|
|
|
|
let db;
|
|
let cleanup;
|
|
let eventId;
|
|
let photoId;
|
|
|
|
async function rate(rating, guestIdentifier = GUEST_A) {
|
|
return feedbackService.submitFeedback(photoId, eventId, {
|
|
feedback_type: 'rating',
|
|
rating,
|
|
ip_address: '127.0.0.1',
|
|
user_agent: 'jest',
|
|
}, guestIdentifier);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function ratingRows(guestIdentifier) {
|
|
const q = db('photo_feedback').where({
|
|
photo_id: photoId,
|
|
feedback_type: 'rating',
|
|
});
|
|
if (guestIdentifier) q.where('guest_identifier', guestIdentifier);
|
|
return q.select('*');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function photoAverage() {
|
|
const photo = await db('photos').where('id', photoId).first();
|
|
return Number(photo.average_rating);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(async () => {
|
|
({ db, cleanup } = await bootCrmDb());
|
|
await seedMinimal(db);
|
|
const inserted = await db('events').insert({
|
|
slug: EVENT_SLUG,
|
|
event_type: 'wedding',
|
|
event_name: 'Rating Removal Test',
|
|
event_date: '2026-06-22',
|
|
host_email: 'host@example.com',
|
|
admin_email: 'admin@example.com',
|
|
password_hash: 'x',
|
|
share_link: `/gallery/${EVENT_SLUG}/share`,
|
|
share_token: 'rating-removal-share',
|
|
expires_at: new Date(Date.now() + 7 * 24 * 3600 * 1000).toISOString(),
|
|
is_active: 1,
|
|
is_archived: 0,
|
|
is_draft: 0,
|
|
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
}).returning('id');
|
|
eventId = inserted[0]?.id ?? inserted[0];
|
|
|
|
const r = await db('photos').insert({
|
|
event_id: eventId,
|
|
filename: 'photo-1.jpg',
|
|
path: 'events/rating-removal/1.jpg',
|
|
type: 'individual',
|
|
uploaded_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
}).returning('id');
|
|
photoId = r[0]?.id ?? r[0];
|
|
}, 120000);
|
|
|
|
afterAll(async () => { if (cleanup) await cleanup(); });
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await db('photo_feedback').where('event_id', eventId).del();
|
|
await db('photos').where('id', photoId).update({ average_rating: 0, feedback_count: 0 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('rating removal (#884)', () => {
|
|
test('rating 0 deletes the existing rating row and resets the average', async () => {
|
|
const created = await rate(4);
|
|
expect(created.created).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(await photoAverage()).toBe(4);
|
|
|
|
const removed = await rate(0);
|
|
expect(removed.removed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(await ratingRows(GUEST_A)).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(await photoAverage()).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rating 0 without an existing rating is a no-op (no 0-row inserted)', async () => {
|
|
const r = await rate(0);
|
|
expect(r.removed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(await ratingRows()).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(await photoAverage()).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('removal is guest-scoped: guest B keeps their rating and the average', async () => {
|
|
await rate(2, GUEST_A);
|
|
await rate(4, GUEST_B);
|
|
expect(await photoAverage()).toBe(3);
|
|
|
|
const removed = await rate(0, GUEST_A);
|
|
expect(removed.removed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(await ratingRows(GUEST_A)).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(await ratingRows(GUEST_B)).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(await photoAverage()).toBe(4);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('numeric string "0" also clears (truthy-string bypass guard)', async () => {
|
|
await rate(4);
|
|
const removed = await rate('0');
|
|
expect(removed.removed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(await ratingRows(GUEST_A)).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(await photoAverage()).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('malformed rating input never clears an existing rating', async () => {
|
|
await rate(4);
|
|
for (const bad of [undefined, null, 'bad', NaN]) {
|
|
const r = await rate(bad);
|
|
expect(r.removed).toBeFalsy();
|
|
}
|
|
expect(await ratingRows(GUEST_A)).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('clearing deletes racy duplicate rating rows, not just the first', async () => {
|
|
// Simulate the check-then-insert race: two rating rows for one guest.
|
|
const row = {
|
|
photo_id: photoId,
|
|
event_id: eventId,
|
|
feedback_type: 'rating',
|
|
guest_identifier: GUEST_A,
|
|
is_approved: 1,
|
|
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
};
|
|
await db('photo_feedback').insert({ ...row, rating: 3 });
|
|
await db('photo_feedback').insert({ ...row, rating: 5 });
|
|
expect(await ratingRows(GUEST_A)).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
|
|
const removed = await rate(0);
|
|
expect(removed.removed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(await ratingRows(GUEST_A)).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(await photoAverage()).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('re-rating with a different value still updates in place', async () => {
|
|
await rate(3);
|
|
const updated = await rate(5);
|
|
expect(updated.updated).toBe(true);
|
|
const rows = await ratingRows(GUEST_A);
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(rows[0].rating).toBe(5);
|
|
expect(await photoAverage()).toBe(5);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|