Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
paul ccf59d1d4d Fix 001_init.js to follow proper migration pattern
Mirror to GitHub / mirror (push) Successful in 24s
Test and Lint / backend-test (push) Successful in 1m39s
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
Test and Lint / frontend-test (push) Successful in 2m0s
Version and Release / version-bump (push) Successful in 33s
Version and Release / trigger-drone (push) Has been skipped
- Changed from standalone script to proper migration with exports.up/down
- Removed process.exit() calls that were terminating the migration runner
- Removed immediate execution of runMigrations()
- Now properly exports migration functions like other migrations

This was the root cause - 001_init.js was executing immediately when
required and calling process.exit(), preventing it from being run as
a migration and causing 029 to run first on an empty database.
2025-07-25 13:00:03 +02:00
paul 519518ed6c Fix migration order by renaming init.js to 001_init.js
Mirror to GitHub / mirror (push) Successful in 25s
Test and Lint / backend-test (push) Successful in 1m23s
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
Test and Lint / frontend-test (push) Successful in 2m5s
Version and Release / version-bump (push) Failing after 39s
Version and Release / trigger-drone (push) Has been skipped
- Renamed core/init.js to core/001_init.js to ensure it runs first
- Updated detectExistingSchema() to reference 001_init.js
- This fixes the issue where backup migrations tried to access
  app_settings table before it was created
- Migrations now run in correct order: init first, then numbered

The error occurred because alphabetical sorting put 029 before init,
causing migrations to fail on new deployments.
2025-07-25 11:37:52 +02:00