The dialog described what is sent and where it goes, but never said which way
the connection runs. That is the part an operator is actually being asked to
accept: opening an outbound path to someone else's service.
PicPeak sends and never pulls. One place in the service reaches the network,
it is a POST, and it requests exactly two paths — /api/envelopes, and
/api/participant/lookup only when an operator asks for their own export. No
scheduled job contacts the collector; the daily rollup is driven solely by an
authenticated admin hitting /activity. There is no route the collector could
call, and redirect: 'error' means it cannot even point a request somewhere
else. From a reply only the acknowledgement for the packet just sent is read,
with every field compared against that packet before it is accepted; the
stored copy drops the session token and no read path hands it back to the UI.
A requested export is streamed to the operator as a file and never
interpreted.
The consequence is why it belongs in the consent text and not only in the
docs: this channel cannot deliver code, configuration or content into an
installation, not even from a collector that has been taken over. It is a
security property by design rather than by convention.
usageOutboundOnly.test.js guards it by source inspection rather than
behaviour, because a behavioural test only proves that today's calls behave.
It fails the moment someone adds a second fetch, a poll for messages, a
scheduled pull, or a public route touching the usage service — verified by
injecting each of those.
