Stable twin of #1147, filter half only. Every filter token on /photos is an OR of two halves: what THIS viewer marked, and what ANYONE marked. The fields built from the second half are gated on show_feedback_to_guests; the filter was not, so with the setting off ?filter=liked still returned exactly the photos other people liked — the membership instead of the count, one token at a time. The half it left standing was also the wrong half: it read guest_identifier from the guest_id query parameter, which never matched anything, and accepting a caller-supplied identifier was a way back through the gate. Resolved from the request now, hidden rows excluded to match what the viewer can see. Not carried: the color: token and the photo_admin_marks concurrent-write fix — colour labels and admin marks are not on this branch. Merged with admin privileges: the author cannot self-approve.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -413,7 +413,10 @@ router.get('/:slug/show/:token/state', handleAsync(async (req, res) => {
|
||||
router.get('/:slug/photos', verifyGalleryAccess, resolveGuest, async (req, res) => {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// Get filter and sort parameters from query
|
||||
const { filter, guest_id, sort = 'upload_date', order = 'desc' } = req.query;
|
||||
// `guest_id` is deliberately NOT read from the query string: the viewer's
|
||||
// own feedback is resolved from the request identity instead (see the
|
||||
// filter block). The frontend still sends it; it is ignored.
|
||||
const { filter, sort = 'upload_date', order = 'desc' } = req.query;
|
||||
|
||||
// Get watermark settings to generate cache-busting version for URLs
|
||||
const watermarkSettings = await watermarkService.getWatermarkSettings();
|
||||
@@ -458,6 +461,13 @@ router.get('/:slug/photos', verifyGalleryAccess, resolveGuest, async (req, res)
|
||||
// Execute the query
|
||||
let photos = await photosQuery;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if feedback should be visible to guests. Read BEFORE the filter
|
||||
// block, not after: the filters below consult it, because a filter that
|
||||
// selects on other people's feedback is a way of reading that feedback.
|
||||
const feedbackService = require('../services/feedbackService');
|
||||
const feedbackSettings = await feedbackService.getEventFeedbackSettings(req.event.id);
|
||||
const showFeedbackToGuests = isClient || parseBooleanInput(feedbackSettings.show_feedback_to_guests, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Apply filtering if requested (supports global stats + per-guest interactions)
|
||||
if (filter) {
|
||||
const filterTokens = new Set(
|
||||
@@ -487,10 +497,37 @@ router.get('/:slug/photos', verifyGalleryAccess, resolveGuest, async (req, res)
|
||||
});
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Whose feedback counts as "mine" for these filters.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Resolved from the REQUEST, the same either/or the per-viewer is_liked
|
||||
// query below uses — never from the `guest_id` query parameter. Two
|
||||
// reasons, and both matter now that this is the only half left when
|
||||
// feedback is hidden:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// - It never matched. The frontend's `gallery_guest_id` is a
|
||||
// localStorage string it invents (`guest_<ts>_<rand>`) and never
|
||||
// sends when submitting feedback; submissions store
|
||||
// generateGuestIdentifier(req). So this lookup found nothing, and
|
||||
// the filters only ever worked through the aggregate half — which
|
||||
// is exactly the half now gated.
|
||||
// - It is caller-controlled. Accepting an identifier from the query
|
||||
// string would let anyone holding someone else's read their hidden
|
||||
// memberships one token at a time, straight back through the gate.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Hidden rows are excluded, matching what the viewer can actually SEE:
|
||||
// getPhotoFeedback drops is_hidden for the guest's own feedback too.
|
||||
// Unapproved rows are NOT excluded — a comment still in the moderation
|
||||
// queue is still the viewer's own, and that same read keeps it.
|
||||
let guestFeedbackByType = null;
|
||||
if (guest_id) {
|
||||
const guestFeedbackRows = await db('photo_feedback')
|
||||
.where({ event_id: req.event.id, guest_identifier: guest_id })
|
||||
{
|
||||
const viewerFeedback = db('photo_feedback')
|
||||
.where({ event_id: req.event.id, is_hidden: false });
|
||||
if (req.guest?.id) {
|
||||
viewerFeedback.where('guest_id', req.guest.id);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
viewerFeedback.where('guest_identifier', generateGuestIdentifier(req));
|
||||
}
|
||||
const guestFeedbackRows = await viewerFeedback
|
||||
.select('photo_id', 'feedback_type');
|
||||
|
||||
guestFeedbackByType = guestFeedbackRows.reduce((acc, row) => {
|
||||
@@ -509,39 +546,50 @@ router.get('/:slug/photos', verifyGalleryAccess, resolveGuest, async (req, res)
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Every token below is an OR of two halves: what THIS viewer marked,
|
||||
// and what ANYONE marked. The second half is other people's feedback,
|
||||
// so it is gated on show_feedback_to_guests exactly like the counts
|
||||
// this endpoint returns.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Without the gate the setting only hides the numbers. A guest could
|
||||
// still send `?filter=liked` and get back precisely the set of photos
|
||||
// other people liked — the membership, one token at a time, which is
|
||||
// most of what the counts would have told them. The viewer's own half
|
||||
// is always theirs to filter by.
|
||||
const includeAggregate = (predicate) => {
|
||||
if (showFeedbackToGuests) includeBy(predicate);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if (filterTokens.has('liked')) {
|
||||
includeGuestMatches('like');
|
||||
includeBy(photo => (photo.like_count || 0) > 0);
|
||||
includeAggregate(photo => (photo.like_count || 0) > 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (filterTokens.has('favorited')) {
|
||||
includeGuestMatches('favorite');
|
||||
includeBy(photo => (photo.favorite_count || 0) > 0);
|
||||
includeAggregate(photo => (photo.favorite_count || 0) > 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (filterTokens.has('rated')) {
|
||||
includeGuestMatches('rating');
|
||||
includeBy(photo => (photo.average_rating || 0) > 0);
|
||||
includeAggregate(photo => (photo.average_rating || 0) > 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (filterTokens.has('commented')) {
|
||||
includeGuestMatches('comment');
|
||||
const commentedRows = await db('photo_feedback')
|
||||
.where({ event_id: req.event.id, feedback_type: 'comment', is_approved: true, is_hidden: false })
|
||||
.groupBy('photo_id')
|
||||
.select('photo_id');
|
||||
commentedRows.forEach(row => include.add(row.photo_id));
|
||||
if (showFeedbackToGuests) {
|
||||
const commentedRows = await db('photo_feedback')
|
||||
.where({ event_id: req.event.id, feedback_type: 'comment', is_approved: true, is_hidden: false })
|
||||
.groupBy('photo_id')
|
||||
.select('photo_id');
|
||||
commentedRows.forEach(row => include.add(row.photo_id));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
photos = photos.filter(photo => include.has(photo.id));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if feedback should be visible to guests
|
||||
const feedbackService = require('../services/feedbackService');
|
||||
const feedbackSettings = await feedbackService.getEventFeedbackSettings(req.event.id);
|
||||
const showFeedbackToGuests = isClient || parseBooleanInput(feedbackSettings.show_feedback_to_guests, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then get comment counts separately
|
||||
const commentCounts = await db('photo_feedback')
|
||||
.whereIn('photo_id', photos.map(p => p.id))
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user